remote controlled helicopters & capped percentages
I spent a short amount of time the other day looking up rates for helicopter rides in areas around southern California, Glacier Park in Montana and Oregon, but quickly realized that the cheapest ride I could hitch was $300 for a half an hour per person. Which got me thinking, if I'm considering budgeting $300 plus for one half an hour ride then why wouldn't I spend that money on say, a heavy-duty remote controlled helicopter with a camera mount and have the flexibility to film aerial-shots at any time and more importantly, in any place. So, I've been emailing some people about which models to look at, since it needs to carry some equipment [3 lbs camcorder, wireless a/v transmitter, protective casing]. I will keep you posted on the progress of that as it unfolds. But things are looking promising.
At a party earlier this week, I was talking with Paul, who is heavily involved with the final stages of distribution for an independent film titled, Mango Kiss. And I was going over my budget plan, the money I hope to raise and the lack of money I'll have to spend, for example, on crew members. Which is slowly but surely, becoming a major concern of mine - the odds of finding people willing to commit three months of their lives to a low-budget film with no pay isn't looking too promising. My only hope is film students with no plans for their summer break, which I am looking into. But Paul suggested the possibility of 'capped percentages' as payment after the film is complete, and he said that actually, most independent films operate in that order - the only downside of course is if for some reason your films makes no money, you have a handful of angry crew members on your hands.
Permalink
|



donations
note: all post within









